<![CDATA[IZMinc.ORG - YOU KNOW WHO IT IZ]]>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 14:46:57 -0700Weebly<![CDATA[October 21st, 2012]]>Sun, 21 Oct 2012 16:46:31 GMThttps://izminc.org/you-know-who-it-iz/october-21st-2012IT,Z MONDAY AND GLOBALIZATION IZ ON IT'Z WAY BUT FOR NOW,WE HAVE A TRUE DIVINE CHOICE TO MAKE OUR FAMILY AND COUNTRY TRULY A BETTER PLACE . WHO KNEW ALL THE TIME. CURTSEY OF THE FORTH POLITICAL PARTY,THE IZMPARTY.  Picture
Obama campaign accepted foreign Web donation -- and may be hiding more
By ISABEL VINCENT and MELISSA KLEIN
Last Updated: 10:11 AM, October 21, 2012
Posted: 12:34 AM, October 21, 2012

EXCLUSIVE

The Obama re-election campaign has accepted at least one foreign donation in violation of the law — and does nothing to check on the provenance of millions of dollars in other contributions, a watchdog group alleges.

Chris Walker, a British citizen who lives outside London, told The Post he was able to make two $5 donations to President Obama’s campaign this month through its Web site while a similar attempt to give Mitt Romney cash was rejected. It is illegal to knowingly solicit or accept money from foreign citizens.

Walker said he used his actual street address in England but entered Arkansas as his state with the Schenectady, NY, ZIP code of 12345.
’NET PROFIT: President Obama and Hillary Clinton are joined at a 2011 state dinner by Robert Roche (to Clinton’s right), who registered the site Obama.com, which directs visitors to a donation page.

“When I did Romney’s, the payment got rejected on the grounds that the address on the card did not match the address that I entered,” he said. “Romney’s Web site wanted the code from the back of card. Barack Obama’s didn’t.”

In September, Obama’s campaign took in more than $2 million from donors who provided no ZIP code or incomplete ZIP codes, according to data posted on the Federal Election Commission Web site.

The Obama campaign said the FEC data was the result of “a minor technical error.”

“All the ZIP codes and numbers are real and can be verified,” spokesman Michael Czin said.

The Obama campaign’s apparent lack of safeguards makes it possible to violate the law, says a report released by the Government Accountability Institute, a Florida-based watchdog group.

The report found that one Obama site — Obama.com — gets almost half of its traffic from foreign computer addresses. The site directs users to an Obama donation page.

“We are not suggesting that just foreign traffic by itself is a problem,” said Peter Schweizer, president of the GAI. “But for a campaign that is very sophisticated in its fund-raising capabilities, they do not make one effort to try to even see or ask somebody to check a box that says they are a US citizen.”

Obama’s re-election campaign took in $130,867 from donors who provided no ZIP codes and $2 million from those with incomplete ZIPs in September.

That same month, Romney’s campaign recorded $2,450 from donors without ZIP codes and $2,500 from those with incomplete ZIPs.

Walker said it should have been clear to the Obama campaign’s computers that his donations came from a computer with a foreign IP address.

The Obama campaign says it “screens all credit-card contributions that originate from a foreign IP address” and requests proof of citizenship if questions arise.

But not only did Walker’s Obama donations go through, but he said he began receiving two to three e-mail solicitations a day to give more. The e-mails asked for $188 or more.

If Walker gave $188, his total contribution to Obama would be $198 — less than the $200 threshold at which campaigns have to identify the donor to the FEC.

“I have not had any e-mails asking for proof of identity,” Walker said.

The GAI report found the Obama campaign Web sites do not ask donors to provide their three-digit card-verification value, or CVV, numbers to ensure they are the legitimate holders of the card. Romney’s campaign asks for such information, which is considered a standard security measure.

One conduit for Obama donations is Obama.com, which was registered in 2008 to Robert Roche, an American who lives and works in China, where he owns an infomercial company.

Roche is also a bundler for the Obama campaign and was given a seat at the head table for a 2011 state dinner with the Chinese president

The GAI report said that the site registration was changed in 2010 to make it anonymous and that it was unclear whether Roche still owns it.

Roche’s mother in Chicago referred calls to the Obama campaign. The campaign declined to comment.

melissa.klein@nypost.com

]]>
<![CDATA[October 19th, 2012]]>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 17:59:34 GMThttps://izminc.org/you-know-who-it-iz/october-19th-20121YEAH IRAQ IT'Z FRIDAY   Picture
A chronic political paralysis in Iraq

Keeping national partnerships aside, those who get more votes in the elections ought to be given a chance to run the country
By Mohammad Akif Jamal, Special to Gulf News
Published: 00:00 October 20, 2012



When Iraqi President Jalal Talabani left for Germany last April on a therapeutic journey, the Iraqi political crisis was at its peak. However, upon his return to the country after four months, the crisis remained as it was — as though it was waiting for the president’s return.

The president has recovered, but the Iraqi political crisis remains a problem for all Iraqis.

The no-confidence vote against Prime Minister Nouri Al Maliki is no more an issue in Iraq; neither is calling him for accountability by the parliament.

Talk, however, has resumed about reforms and the National Assembly, which was called for by the President of Iraq before his departure and after the Iraqi political crisis started at the Erbil summit, then Najaf, then in Erbil once more between the Kurdish Province President, the Chairman of the Al Iraqia Coalition and the Chairman of the Sadrist Movement.

Article continues below


Media outlets have circulated news about a reform doctrine that is being prepared by a committee from the National Alliance presided by former prime minister Ebrahim Al Jafari, though some parties inside the alliance are denying the existence of such a paper.

So what will be discussed inside the new National Assembly? And what points will be accepted?

The concept of reforms does not mean amending the constitutional structure, which is being demanded now. However, it reflects the re-distribution of interests, authorities and the area of participation in decision-making between political blocs.

Frankly, this is unlikely to happen as it will be at the expense of the vast authorities enjoyed by the prime minister himself. Moreover, it will neither suit the prime minister nor the national alliance he belongs to, because Al Maliki is in a stronger position than his opponents. He succeeded in aborting all efforts to topple his government and consequently the attack against him subsided, despite the fact that the roots of discontent are still alive.

However, although Al Maliki has become strong enough to stand against challenges inside Iraq, he has weakened himself against the US, which has signed the Status of Forces Agreement (Sofa) with Iraq through his controversial policies towards Syria. It seems Al Maliki’s relationship with the US is verging on the cold side after the US accused his government of backing the Syrian regime and overlooking the arms shipments crossing over to Syria through Iraqi skies.

The National Assembly is not expected to succeed in solving the country’s problems.

It is not wise for Iraqi political bloc leaders to count on the remaining months of this current Iraqi government, which is dominated by political, ethnic, sectarian and regional imbalances. Their true interest is to look beyond than that as the parliamentary elections are not too far away. The coming days and months will offer a golden opportunity to these political blocs to rally for elections.

And in as much as the opposing blocs will benefit from pushing Al Maliki and his bloc towards isolation, Al Maliki’s bloc will also work systematically to weaken its foes. As a result, a lot of changes are expected to take place in the current political equations in Iraq.

The coalition headed by Al Maliki will work on weakening its foes. On top of that list comes the Sadrist movement, especially since the movement no longer enjoys the kind of regional support or cover that it used to. The Kurdish Alliance, on the other hand, is suffering from internal strife, which, no doubted, will affect its stand. It is no longer a secret that many Kurdish politicians are concerned about the continuous retardation in the relationship between Baghdad and Erbil and the confrontation policy adopted by the Kurdish Province Presidency.

The Kurdish Province President, Masoud Barzani, is also facing trouble as the National Kurdish Union, headed by Iraqi President Talabani, decided to bury the hatchet with the Kurdish opposition Gorran movement, led by Nushirwan Mustafa, and agreed to adopt policies that could weaken Barzani through amending the Kurdish constitution. This amendment will change the political system in the province into a parliamentary one and not a presidential system, exactly as the system followed in the Iraqi constitution. This move resembles a frank challenge to the authorities of the Kurdish Province’s president and a refusal for his extended authorities given to him by the constitution. This will also escalate tensions with Baghdad.

The Al Iraqiya Coalition, headed by Dr Eyad Allawi, on the other hand, is suffering splits. The coalition itself does not resemble any threat to Al Maliki’s coalition anymore, as was the case during the March 2010 elections.

The political crisis in Iraq has become chronic and the inability to find a solution is also chronic. Maybe, the whole concept of national partnership has paralysed the political process in the country and needs to be substituted with another system which gives those who get more votes in the elections a chance to run the country in a more appropriate manner.

Dr Mohammad Akif Jamal is an Iraqi writer based in Dubai.

]]>
<![CDATA[October 19th, 2012]]>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 17:43:20 GMThttps://izminc.org/you-know-who-it-iz/october-19th-2012POOR IRAQ I OVERSTAND U  Picture
Iraq seeks ousted cenbank chief's arrest in graft probe




BAGHDAD | Fri Oct 19, 2012 12:25pm BST

(Reuters) - Iraqi authorities have issued arrest warrants for the former central bank chief and other bank officials after a probe into corruption, a decision likely to fuel investor worries the government is interfering with the bank's autonomy.

The warrants were announced after Iraq's cabinet on Tuesday ousted director Sinan al-Shibibi over parliamentary charges bank officials were abusing dollar sales. An independent integrity watchdog had been investigated the charges.

"The judicial panel of the Integrity Court is investigating the matter," said Abdul-Sattar al-Birqdar, a spokesman for the Supreme Judiciary Council. "They issued the arrest warrant against Sinan al-Shibibi and other officials in the bank."
FREE GUIDES AND REPORTS FROM DIANOMI
ADVERTISEMENT
U.S. Election Report
How might the U.S election affect the USD and EUR?
Download FREE Guide

The Integrity Court is part of Iraq's Supreme Judicial Council, which supervises the courts and judicial issues.

The central bank said this week it did not object to the investigation. Shibibi's whereabouts were not immediately clear. But the bank chief recently travelled to Tokyo and Europe on business and it was not clear whether he returned to Iraq.

Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki last year won a court ruling that put the central bank and other independent bodies under cabinet supervision, a move his opponents said would allow the Shi'ite premier to consolidate his power.

Iraq's political system has mired in infighting among Shi'ite, Sunni Muslim and ethnic Kurdish blocks, some of whom accuse Maliki of failing to fulfil power-sharing agreements in the cross-sectarian government.

But corruption is rife in the OPEC nation as its oil industry rebuilds and foreign investors seek to reconstruct its infrastructure after years of war and sanctions even before the 2003 invasion that ousted Saddam Hussein.

(Reporting by Aseel Kami; writing by Patrick Markey)

]]>
<![CDATA[THANK YOU AND YOU ARE WELCOM]]>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 18:27:06 GMThttps://izminc.org/you-know-who-it-iz/thank-you-and-you-are-welcomHezbollah leader warns US of repercussions over anti-Islam filmSheikh Hassan Nasrallah makes rare public appearance to support protests that are continuing from Tunisia to Indonesia



Bodyguards surround Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah as he denounces the anti-Islam film to protesters in Beirut. Photograph: Joseph Eid/AFP/Getty Images
Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah, the leader of Lebanon's powerful Hezbollahmovement, has called for new demonstrations to express outrage at a film that denigrates Islam and the prophet Muhammad, as unrest triggered by it continues from Tunisia to Indonesia.

"Prophet of God, we offer ourselves, our blood and our kin for the sake of your dignity and honour," Nasrallah told supporters who chanted "death to Israel" and "death to America" at a rally in the southern Shia suburbs of Beirut. "The US should understand that if it broadcasts the film in full it will face very dangerous repercussions around the world."

Nasrallah, who fears assassination by Israel, appears in public only rarely. Political opponents suggested that anger over the film, Innocence of Muslims, was a useful diversion from the bloody crisis in neighbouring Syria, where the Assad government, along with Iran, is a patron of the Lebanese militant group.

In Tunis, police surrounded a mosque where a Salafi leader was meeting followers. Sheikh Saif-Allah Benhassine is wanted by police over clashes at the US embassy last week, but he managed to slip past the cordon and escape.

President Barack Obama called US diplomatic staff in Sudan, Tunisia,Libya and Yemen at the weekend, to reassure them that their security is a top priority for the US government.

Reflecting nervousness about the protests in the region, the US embassy in Beirut has started to destroy classified material as a security precaution, the Associated Press reported.

In Benghazi, Libya's second city, the Islamist brigade suspected of involvement in the death of US ambassador Chris Stevens last week said that America was to blame for allowing the release of the film.

"We categorically deny we were there," said Youssef el-Gehani, spokesman of the Ansar al-Sharia brigade. "American policies target some of the most sacred elements of our religion so you should expect a reaction," he told the Guardian. "The embassy [US consulate] knew how sensitive it was to have that film, they should have evacuated the embassy."

At the weekend, Libya's de facto head of state, Mohamed al-Magariaf, said Ansar al-Sharia members were involved in the night-long assault that left four US consulate staff dead. He linked the group to al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb.

Gehani warned that the US would continue to face attacks in Muslim countries. "If America wants respect in the Arab world, it should avoid spilling blood in places such as Syria and Afghanistan, and avoid insulting the prophet."

His comments came amid chaos within Libya's government, with the deputy interior minister, Wanis al-Sharif, being sacked after claiming that 50 suspects had been arrested in connection with the attack on the anniversary of 9/11. The interior minister, Fawzi Abdul Al, insisted only four arrests had been made.

On Sunday a video was released showing Stevens was still alive when he was found after the attack. A Libyan witness told the Associated Press that Stevens was still breathing, though his face was blackened and he seemed paralysed.

In Pakistan, the prime minister, Raja Pervaiz Ashraf, ordered the suspension of YouTube over the "blasphemous" Muhammad film. Two protesters were killed as police used teargas and fired into the air to control crowds which have grown since last week. Thousands of people shouting anti-American slogans took to the streets in Peshawar, Lahore, and, for a second day, in Karachi.

Violent rage also spread to Kabul in Afghanistan, with hundreds of people taking to the streets, burning tyres and a car, and attacking police and a US base with stones.

Indonesian police fired teargas and water cannon to disperse hundreds of demonstrators who massed outside the US embassy in Jakarta, the capital of the world's most populous Muslim country.

Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was quoted on state TV as saying that western leaders must prove they were not "accomplices" in a "big crime".

In Egypt, two prominent figures are facing legal action over broadcasting a clip of the film. Khaled Abdallah, an ultra-conservative television anchor, and Nader Bakkar, spokesman of the Salafi al-Nour party, stand accused of instigating violence that led to the storming of the US embassy in Cairo.

Tony Blair, meanwhile, told the BBC that the offending film was "wrong and offensive but also laughable as a piece of film-making". He added: "What is dangerous and wrong is the reaction to it."

The family of Nakoula Basseley Nakoula left their California home in the middle of the night on Monday and have been taken to an undisclosed location, a Los Angeles police spokesman said.

Nakoula has been identified by US federal authorities as the key figure behind Innocence of Muslims.

]]>
<![CDATA[IZ THIZ OVER  OH THEY  TOOK IT  THOUGH SHALL NOT STEAL]]>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 18:23:36 GMThttps://izminc.org/you-know-who-it-iz/iz-thiz-over-oh-they-took-it-though-shall-not-stealAnti-Japan Demonstrations Spread, Costs Rising, as the Japan-China Crisis Worsens; China Defining New Regional Order; Panetta Due in Tokyo this Week

 6 comments, 2 called-out
+ Comment now
Is there anyone who still believes that the Noda government decision to “nationalize” the Senkaku islands (claimed and by China as their “sacred territory” and

Protesters (front) hold a banner reading 'Diaoyu islands belong to China' as people march down a street in Weihai, in eastern China's Shandong province, to protest against Japan 'nationalizing' the Diaoyu islands, also known as the Senkaku Islands in Japanese, on September 11, 2012. China has dispatched two patrol ships to 'assert its sovereignty' over islands at the centre of a row with Japan, state media said on September 11, as Tokyo completed its purchase of the disputed territory. (Image credit: AFP/Getty Images via @daylife)


called Diaoyudao) was not a gigantic blunder?   I would venture that by now–as they watch the spreading anti-Japanese protests in China, recently including attacks on Japanese diplomatic missions and pillaging of Japanese businesses–defenders of the government’s move in Japan are a small and still diminishing minority.

The Chinese official line going into the crisis was that majority Japanese public opinion was against the provocative nationalization decision.  I suppose there were some opinion surveys to this effect.  What may have been typical Japanese expressions of diffidence and unease with forthright action may have allowed this Chinese interpretation, even if it was a stretch at the time.   It is no stretch now to say that the ferocious (but, sadly, wholly predictable) Chinese popular and official reaction is sending pangs of doubt and fear throughout Japan, from fields and factories in the provinces, to the central government offices in Kasumigaseki and the Prime Minister residence in Akasaka, Tokyo.

The Japanese press reported demonstrations in 85 Chinese cities yesterday.  Crowds marching past the Japanese embassy in Beijing swelled to thousands.  Crowds broke into the Japanese consulate in Guangzhou.  Offices and factories of Japanese businesses have been attached and damaged.  Canon is stoping production and locking down three of its four Chinese manufacturing plants, those making digital cameras and printers, for two days, the 17th and 18th.    Panasonic is also closing until the 18th three plants in Guangdong, telling workers to stay home.  Lion Corporation has closed its toothbrush plant in Qingdao.  Many other Japanese businesses in other cities are shutting down or curtailing operations.

Many, if not all, Japanese schools in China are suspending classes and telling students to stay home until the situation calms.  Many companies are thinking to send back to Japan dependent family members of their Japanese managers.  Planned travel to China is being curtailed.

The crisis over the weekend claimed one high profile life:  that of 60 year old Nishmiya Shinichi, the senior ministry of foreign affairs official who just weeks ago was appointed Japan’s new ambassador to China.  Nishimiya has been in Tokyo, preparing to take up his post, working to exhaustion as the crisis has escalated.  Only officially appointed last Tuesday, Nishimiya collapsed in the street near his Shibuya residence on Thursday.  He died in the hospital Sunday.

It would be comforting to think that this crisis is close to an end.  Such wishful thinking is unrealistic.  Much more likely is that we are just at the beginning.  So far the damage to Japanese business interests has been from “popular,” rather than official, acts.  But Chinese government retaliation has been promised and will certainly be delivered.  And it will not be small.

As I have written before, the political and economic reality is East Asia is that China has become the dominant local power, and its relative dominance grows by the year.   At the same time, economic integration in East Asia has broadened and deepened, such that the importance of China for the economies of all the countries in the region has multiplied.   At this point, while all the countries benefit from ties to each other, China is the queen bee on which all others rely most.

The stark truth is that the other countries (not least Japan) need China more than China needs any of the countries.  (That this is the historically the Chinese world view, and is offensive to modern sensibilities, does not make it less true.)  Situations like the present (also the scrap with the Philippines over the Spratly islands) provide China an opportunity to employ its leverage and to nudge regional relations toward what it sees as a more natural order.

But I have left out one of the other regional powers:  the United States.  Or have I?  It should not escape notice that the U.S. has been of no help to Japan (or, to be sure, to China) in the Senkaku/Diaoyu dispute.  I would suggest, rather, that U.S. influence (and the abiding but wistful faith in Japan’s U.S. client status still held by old timers in Japan’s political-military establishment) was a factor in the Noda government’s hugely miscalculated decision.

But of course the U.S. is involved, if only because of the U.S.-Japan military alliance and the chance that the now dueling patrols of China and Japanese ships around the Senkakus/Diaoyudao could flash into hot fighting, the escalation from which could engulf Japan, China, and the U.S.

So it is no surprise that U.S. Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta is dropping into Tokyo this week for talks with the Noda government, to prepare for his next stop, Beijing.   But no one is promising or expecting a U.S. effort at shuttle diplomacy to resolve this crisis.   Sadly, the time for diplomacy came and went.  It will come again, but not until some lessons about the new Asian order are taught and learned.

]]>
<![CDATA[I AM THE OLD NETNYAHU IN AN AGEING BODY NOT THE NEW NETNYAHU WHO GETS]]>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 16:34:33 GMThttps://izminc.org/you-know-who-it-iz/i-am-the-old-netnyahu-in-an-ageing-body-not-the-new-netnyahu-who-getsPicture
Exclusive: U.S. Scales-Back Military Exercise with Israel, Affecting Potential Iran Strike A smaller U.S. contingent may make it more difficult for the Israeli government to launch a pre-emptive strike on Tehran's nuclear program. By Karl Vick and Aaron J. Klein | August 31, 2012 | + inShare1 Log In with Facebook Sharing TIME stories with friends is easier than ever. Add TIME to your Timeline.

Learn More XSharing With Friends Add TIME to your Timeline to automatically share TIME stories, photos and videos with your Facebook friends.

Share Only the Stories You Want TIME will alert you each time a story is shared and you'll have the option to keep or remove each story from your Facebook Timeline. Plus, view "Your Activity" to see a history of stories you've read and remove stories from your Timeline.

ABIR SULTAN / EPA Israeli soldiers are seen during a military exercise in Golan Heights, Aug. 21, 2012. Israeli Armed Forces have been conducting maneuvers amid raising tensions in the region. Seven months ago, Israel and the United States postponed a massive joint military exercise that was originally set to go forward just as concerns were brimming that Israel would launch a strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities. The exercise was rescheduled for late October, and appears likely to go forward on the cusp of the U.S. presidential election. But it won’t be nearly the same exercise. Well-placed sources in both countries have told TIME that Washington has greatly reduced the scale of U.S. participation, slashing by more than two-thirds the number of American troops going to Israel and reducing both the number and potency of missile interception systems at the core of the joint exercise.

“Basically what the Americans are saying is, ‘We don’t trust you,’” a senior Israeli military official tells TIME.

The reductions are striking. Instead of the approximately 5,000 U.S. troops originally trumpeted for Austere Challenge 12, as the annual exercise is called, the Pentagon will send only 1,500 service members, and perhaps as few as 1,200.  Patriot anti-missile systems will arrive in Israel as planned, but the crews to operate them will not.  Instead of two Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense warships being dispatched to Israeli waters, the new plan is to send one, though even the remaining vessel is listed as a “maybe,” according to officials in both militaries.

A Pentagon spokesperson declined to discuss specifics of the reduced deployment, noting that planning for the exercise was classified. But in an e-mailed statement, Commander Wendy L. Snyder emphasized that the Israeli military has been kept informed of the changes. “Throughout all the planning and coordination, we’ve been lock-step with the Israel Defense Force (IDF) and will continue to do so,” Snyder said.

U.S. commanders privately revealed the scaling back to their Israeli counterparts more than two months ago.  The official explanation was budget restrictions.  But the American retreat coincided with growing tensions between the Obama and Netanyahu administrations on Israel’s persistent threats to launch an airstrike on Iran. The Islamic Republic would be expected to retaliate by missile strikes, either through its own intermediate range arsenal or through its proxy, the Hizballah militia, which has more than 40,000 missiles aimed at Israel from neighboring Lebanon.

In the current political context, the U.S. logic is transparent, says Israeli analyst Efraim Inbar. “I think they don’t want to insinuate that they are preparing something together with the Israelis against Iran – that’s the message,” says Inbar, director of the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies at Bar-Ilan University. “Trust? We don’t trust them. They don’t trust us. All these liberal notions! Even a liberal president like Obama knows better.”

The U.S. anti-missile systems are important because while Israel has made great strides in creating anti-missile shields that protect its population, it doesn’t have enough of them to deploy around the entire country, even with the U.S. aid specifically dedicated to building more (as well as crucial offensive capabilities, such as mid-air refuelers and possibly bunker-busting bombs).  That makes the presence of the Patriots – first deployed to Israel during the First Gulf War, when Saddam Hussein fired Scuds toward the Jewish State — and other U.S. anti-missile systems extremely valuable.  Austere Challenge was billed by assistant secretary of state Andrew J. Shapiro last November as “by far the largest and most significant exercise in U.S.-Israeli history.”  A stated goal was to “improve interoperability” between American and Israeli anti-missile systems – which are already significantly linked. The U.S. maintains an X-band radar installation in Israel’s Negev Desert, pointed toward Iran and linked to Israel’s Arrow anti-missile system.

The radar is extraordinarily powerful, so sensitive it can detect a softball thrown into the air from thousands of miles away.  But as TIME reported earlier, only Americans are allowed to see what’s on the screens, a situation that likely serves to inhibit any Israeli decision to “go it alone” against Iran, because the U.S. array can detect an Iranian missile launch six to seven minutes earlier than Israel’s best radar.  Difficult as it may be to imagine U.S. decision-makers holding back information that could save Israeli lives, both by giving them more time to reach a shelter, or their interceptors to lock onto and destroy an incoming Shahab-3, the risk looms in the complex calculus of Israeli officials mulling an attack on Iran.

Inside Israel, reports persist that prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and defense chief Ehud Barak are determined to launch a strike, and American officials continue to urge restraint.  Israeli analysts say Netanyahu wants Obama to send a letter committing to U.S. military action by a specific date if Iran has not acceded to concessions, but the U.S. administration does not appear to be complying.  U.S. Joint Chiefs chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey told reporters in London this week  that a military strike could damage but not destroy Iran’s nuclear capability, and added, “I don’t want to be complicit if they choose to do it.”

Related Topics: Austere Challenge 12, Efraim Inbar, Ehud Barak, Gen. Martin Dempsey, IDF, Iranian nuclear program, Israeli threat to strike, Joint Exercise, Netanyahu, Obama, iran, israel, Middle East, Military, U.S., Uncategorized


Read more: http://world.time.com/2012/08/31/exclusive-u-s-scales-back-military-exercise-with-israel-affecting-potential-iran-strike/#ixzz258sHqNcg

THE USA HAS A HOLLY DAY COMING UP RESPECT THOSE WHO HAVE KEEP YOU SAFE.   
]]>
<![CDATA[I AM WIDE AWAKE WHY Y'ALL KEEP "JOE BIDEN ME"(F BOMB) WITH ME . NO FOOD NO MONEY]]>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 16:13:42 GMThttps://izminc.org/you-know-who-it-iz/i-am-wide-awake-why-yall-keep-joe-biden-mef-bomb-with-me-no-food-no-money
Iran's supreme leader orders fresh terror attacks on West Iran's Supreme Leader has ordered the country's Revolutionary Guards to intensify its campaign of terror attacks against the West and its allies in retaliation for supporting the overthrow of President Bashar al-Assad in Syria. Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has issed a directive to intensify attacks against the West and its allies around the world Photo: AFP/GETTY < > By

7:00AM BST 22 Aug 2012

According to Western intelligence officials, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei gave the order to the elite Quds Force unit following a recent emergency meeting of Iran's National Security Council in Tehran held to discuss a specially-commissioned report into the implications for Iran of the Assad regime's overthrow.

Damascus is Iran's most important regional ally, and the survival of the Assad regime is regarded as vital to sustaining the Iranian-backed Hizbollah militia which controls southern Lebanon.

The report, which was personally commissioned by Mr Khamenei, concluded that Iran's national interests were being threatened by a combination of the U.N. sanctions imposed over Iran's nuclear programme and the West's continuing support for Syrian opposition groups attempting to overthrow the Syrian government.

Intelligence officials say the report concludes that Iran "cannot be passive" to the new threats posed to its national security, and warns that Western support for Syrian opposition groups was placing Iran's "resistance alliance" in jeopardy, and could seriously disrupt Iran's access to Hizbollah in Lebanon.

It advised that the Iranian regime should demonstrate to the West that there were "red lines" over what it would accept in Syria, and that a warning should be sent to "America, the Zionists, Britain, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and others that they cannot act with impunity in Syria and elsewhere in the region."

]]>
<![CDATA[IZ KIM IN LOVE WITH WORLD LEADER PTAH, IZ SYRIA BIGGER THAN USA]]>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:36:35 GMThttps://izminc.org/you-know-who-it-iz/iz-kim-in-love-with-world-leader-ptah-iz-syria-bigger-than-usaSyria's FM claims government abiding by truce By KARIN LAUB, Associated Press – 35 minutes ago 

BEIRUT (AP) — Syrian forces fired a barrage of mortar shells at an opposition stronghold Wednesday even as the foreign minister promised the regime would respect a week-old cease-fire and withdraw troops from urban centers in line with an international peace plan.

A troop pullback is a key provision of special envoy Kofi Annan's six-point plan to end 13 months of bloodshed in Syria, but the regime has ignored last week's deadline of getting tanks and troops off the streets.

Instead, Syrian soldiers continued to pound rebellious areas with artillery after an initial lull at the start the truce a week ago Thursday, raising growing international concerns that Annan's plan will fail.

In the latest violence Wednesday, activists said regime forces fired mortar shells at the central city of Homs, killing at least two civilians and sending thick gray smoke into the air as loud booms rang across residential areas.

The state news agency also said two separate roadside bombs killed 10 members of the security forces and a civilian in northern Syria. SANA reported that six soldiers were killed and 11 wounded in a blast in the village of Mastouma in Idlib province, while a second explosion in the Aleppo region killed four members of the security forces and a civilian.

The attacks were a sign that both sides have violated the cease-fire and could prompt the regime to intensify its assault on rebellious areas. Syria's government has portrayed the uprising as a foreign-led conspiracy by terrorists and thugs.

Despite persistent violence, the international community is reluctant to declare the cease-fire dead, in part because it is seen as the only way to end bloodshed triggered by an uprising against President Bashar Assad. As part of Annan's road map, a halt to fighting is to be followed by political talks between Assad and Syria's opposition.

Other options, such as foreign military intervention, arming Assad's opponents and economic sanctions, have either been discarded or offer no quick solution. A deadlocked international community would be hard put to offer an alternative if it were to acknowledge the collapse of the cease-fire.

Syrian Foreign Minister Walid Moallem insisted Wednesday that Syria is keeping its commitments. Syria will "continue to cooperate" with Annan's efforts, the Chinese Foreign Ministry quoted Moallem as saying after he met with his Chinese counterpart in Beijing.

Syria will "honor and implement Annan's six-point proposal, fulfill its cease-fire, troop withdrawal and other relevant commitments and begin cooperation with the U.N. monitoring team," Moallem said according to the statement.

China, Russia and Iran have been Syria's staunchest allies. U.N. Security Council members Russia and China have twice shielded the Assad regime from international condemnation, but also demanded that Syria comply with the Annan plan.

After Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov told Moallem last week that Syria could do better, his Chinese counterpart, Yang Jiechi, urged his Syrian visitor Wednesday to make the Annan plan work.

Yang said he hoped Syria would "actively cooperate in putting in place the cease-fire monitoring mechanism, and sincerely embark on a process of inclusive political dialogue and reform to bring about a just, peaceful, and appropriate resolution to the Syrian question."

Yang's remarks were more pointed than in past, an indication that Beijing is looking for progress toward a reduction of violence that might dilute some of the criticism China has come under for blocking U.N. action on Syria.

Meanwhile, U.N. chief Ban Ki-moon was intensifying efforts to get a large contingent of observers on the ground to salvage the truce. He said a team of 250 monitors, as originally envisioned, might not be sufficient for the job. He has also asked the European Union for planes and helicopters to make the mission more effective. Ban is to report to the Security Council on Wednesday.

Moallem said in Beijing that Syria would be ready to provide helicopters, but made no reference to Ban's request to the EU.

"Syria is ready to make its air force available for the use of this delegation," Moallem said. "As we have understood, what is needed are helicopters to evacuate the injured. If that is the issue, then we have the capabilities in our air force to carry this out."

An advance team of half a dozen observers has been in Syria since the weekend. On Tuesday, the team went on its first field trip to the southern city of Daraa where the activists reported protracted fighting between rebel gunmen and Syrian soldiers. On Wednesday, an explosion was heard in the city, followed by a gunbattle, said the Syrian Observatory of Human Rights, an activist group based in Britain.

The head of the team, Col. Ahmed Himiche, said Wednesday that he expects an additional two dozen monitors by Thursday. He said the team would be in touch with both sides in conflict, but did not comment on the trip to Daraa.

Rami Abdul-Rahman, the head of the Observatory, said he and other opposition activists support the truce plan despite widening regime attacks that have claimed dozens of lives in the past week. In Homs, battered by artillery for weeks, with just a brief respite last week, mortar shells fell every 10 to 15 minutes on Wednesday morning, he said. The Observatory said at least two civilians were killed.

"If the Annan plan fails, what happens?" Abdul-Rahman said. "There will be fighting between armed people and the Syrian army. Everyone loses .... Syria will disintegrate. The Annan plan is the last chance for us."

Separately, government-run Syrian television broadcast footage showing Assad and his wife Asma visiting an aid collection center for people displaced by the violence in Homs. The report, aired Tuesday, showed Assad and his wife being mobbed by cheering supporters as they entered the al-Fayha stadium where volunteers were collecting and packing aid donations.

Associated Press writer Scott A. McDonald in Beijing contributed reporting.

]]>
<![CDATA[HE DEAD, NOT DYING FAST ENOUGH ,THE PEOPLE REALLY FEAR NOTHING ANYMORE]]>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 16:00:09 GMThttps://izminc.org/you-know-who-it-iz/no-title2Israeli TV report shows air force gearing up for Iran attack, says moment of truth is near
‘IAF expects losses, and knows it can’t destroy entire Iranian program’
By Greg Tepper April 15, 2012, 11:49 pm 748 Picture
A

major Israel TV station on Sunday night broadcast a detailed report on how Israel will go about attacking Iran’s nuclear facilities in the event that diplomacy and sanctions fail and Israel decides to carry out a military strike.

The report, screened on the main evening news of Channel 10, was remarkable both in terms of the access granted to the reporter, who said he had spent weeks with the pilots and other personnel he interviewed, and in the fact that his assessments on a strike were cleared by the military censor.

No order to strike is likely to be given before the P5+1 talks with Iran resume in May, the reporter, Alon Ben-David, said. “But the coming summer will not only be hot but tense.”

In the event that negotiations fail and the order is given for Israel to carry out an attack on Iranian nuclear facilities, “dozens if not more planes” will take part in the mission: attack and escort jets, tankers for mid-air refueling, electronic warfare planes and rescue helicopters, the report said.

Ben-David said the Israel Air Force “does not have the capacity to destroy the entire Iranian program.” There will be no replication of the decisive strikes on Iraq’s Osirak reactor in 1981 or on Syria in 2007, he said. “The result won’t be definitive.” But, a pilot quoted in the report said, the IAF will have to ensure that it emerges with the necessary result, with “a short and professional” assault.

Ben-David said that if negotiations break down, and Iran moves key parts of its nuclear program underground to its Qom facility, the IAF “is likely to get the order and to set out on the long journey to Iran.”

“Years of preparations are likely to come to realization,” he said, adding that “the moment of truth is near.”

Ben-David interviewed several squadron leaders, pilots and other officers. He noted that some of the IAF personnel, “it is likely, will not return from the mission.” An officer named Gilad said it would be “naive” to think there would be no losses.

The IAF is said to be worried about the advanced anti-aircraft systems that Russia has sold to countries in the region, the report said. Among those systems, the SA 17 and 22 in Syria and Iran present a challenge.

According to the report, it’s the older versions of the F-15 that can fly further than any other plane in Israel’s arsenal, and this puts them on the front line of any potential attack.

One pilot said in the report that the F-15 “is a plane with a very wide range of operation — a combination of relatively energy-efficient engines, and significant flightworthiness regarding weapons and fuel.”

The IAF has a full-sized unmanned plane, the “Eitan,” that is said to be able to fly to Iran, the report indicated. “This plane can do all that is required of it when the order is given,” a pilot said, without elaboration.

The attack, the report said, would presumably trigger a war in northern Israel, with missile attacks (presumably from the Iranian-proxy Hezbollah in Lebanon). “There will be no tranquility and peace anywhere in Israel,” Ben-David said.

This could be the first full-scale war the IAF has fought in nearly 30 years, the report stated.

Pilots had already been told where their families would be moved, away from their bases, for safety, the report said.

]]>
<![CDATA[JUST LIKE AMERICA ,JUST LIKE THE COLORED JUSTLIKE OUR GOVERNMENT]]>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 16:16:46 GMThttps://izminc.org/you-know-who-it-iz/no-title1"THIS ARTICAL SHOULD BECALLED WHEN IT'Z ON IT'Z ON"

THE BEYOND IZ GOOD THO.

RPT-Beyond monitors, world deeply divided on Syria
Picture
* Few believe unarmed monitors will halt Syria violence

* West still wants regime change, Russia, China disagree

* US, allies perhaps shifting towards much longer game

By Peter Apps, Political Risk Correspondent

WASHINGTON, April 14 (Reuters) - With a cease-fire barely holding and the deployment of unarmed foreign observers expected to ease but not end months of violence, world powers are still struggling to find a longer-term strategy for Syria.

After heavy diplomatic wrangling, the United Nations Security Council on Saturday finally approved the deployment of what could be several hundred monitors amid reports of sporadic ongoing fighting.

In theory, the world's most powerful countries, the government of President Bashar al-Assad and much of the Syrian opposition have all signed up to a multipoint plan formulated by former U.N. chief Kofi Annan. But the reality remains much more complex.

While Moscow and Beijing have repeatedly said they want to avoid a Libya-style externally backed regime change, the United States, Britain and France still say they want Assad gone.

"The main focus at the moment is the ... rapid deployment of monitors," said one Western official on condition of anonymity. "That's a priority, but it's not the only one ... at the end of the day, do not see a future for Syria with Assad in charge. We are in this for the long haul."

But officials concede they have few immediate tools with which to make that happen. Even a U.S. plan to provide "nonlethal" support to opposition fighters could end up being shelved, some suspect, largely because the rebels remain so disunited and ineffective.

U.S. pressure, insiders say, has already deterred Saudi Arabia and Qatar from making good on long-running talk they might provide weapons.

For now, Annan, Western powers and their Arab allies say Assad remains in breach of much of the peace plan. Privately, many Western diplomats worry his strategy may be to give just enough to drive a wedge between them and a much more reluctant Russia and China.

"The game for the weekend is watching whether the ceasefire holds and the monitors are approved," said another Western official. "After that it gets more complicated."


SUPERPOWER POLITICS

The most realistic immediate hope, officials say, would be that Assad's forces cease use of heavy weaponry.

But if an earlier Arab league monitoring attempt in Syria - or other previous similar missions in Sri Lanka and Kosovo - are anything to go by, unarmed observers might struggle to stop killings, abductions and use of snipers.

Certainly, few believe Syria will genuinely follow through to withdraw troops from urban areas or allow peaceful protest. For world powers, the true challenge will come if the monitors report a fall in violence but accuse Syria of ignoring other areas of Annan's plan.

At that stage, Western officials say they would return to the Security Council with a much stronger resolution, likely based on drafts previously rejected by Russia and China. That could include much tighter sanctions and perhaps even internationally protected "humanitarian corridors."

Their hope would be that Moscow and Beijing, having invested their own diplomatic capital in Annan, would lose patience with Assad and back tougher action. But some doubt that will happen.

On Friday, a Russian news agency reported Moscow had decided to keep a warship permanently stationed off the Syrian coast "on a permanent basis." While another Russian official said the move had "nothing to do" with events in Syria, it appeared a direct challenge to any foreign states still mulling intervention.

Others, however, believe Russia could yet abandon Assad if given guarantees that its interests - particularly access to the Tartus naval base - were respected. Diplomats say senior Russian officials have briefed foreign counterparts that they ultimately expect him to fall and be replaced with another similar member of the Alawite minority.


PLAYING A LONGER GAME?

That would still not be enough to either meet the requirements of the Annan plan nor the demands of Western powers.

Privately, however, some officials already wonder how realistic their regime change goals might be. At the heart of the policy challenge, they say, is Syria's opposition - widely regarded as chaotic even compared to Libya's notoriously poorly coordinated rebels.

"Your problem is that they are still a very disparate array of groups," said the second Western official. "You have to be sure you are not doing more harm than good."

With some reports opposition fighters themselves may have broken the ceasefire, keeping them to the Annan plan could also be a challenge.

"It's going to be a question of the opposition demonstrating that it's peaceful so that he (Assad) will start to withdraw," said another Western diplomat. "Now, if none of that works, we're back to where we were."

Turkey, analysts say, could yet send forces into Syria to create a buffer zone if cross-border firing and refugee flows continue. But, in general, officials say foreign powers have little appetite for military action. Some believe the United States in particular may be girding itself for a much longer game.

"The policy of this administration is much more about looking at where you want to be in three or four years time and then working out how you get there than it is about managing the here and now," said Jon Alterman, a former U.S. State Department official and now chair of strategy at the Washington think tank the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

"In the longer term, there is a feeling that sanctions will have an effect, that China and particularly Russia can be persuaded to move their position. In the short term, there are real limits to what can be done."

]]>