<![CDATA[IZMinc.ORG - WHAT'Z UP WITH IT]]>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 14:47:19 -0700Weebly<![CDATA[ok whats up with this ya'll say]]>Tue, 19 Nov 2013 05:19:00 GMThttps://izminc.org/whatz-up-with-it/ok-whats-up-with-this-yall-sayPicture
November 15, 2013, 12:14 pm Feinstein 'baffled' by Iran sanctions push By Julian Pecquet

Share on facebook59 Share on twitter16 Share on google_plusone_share More Sharing Services 21 Share on email 67 Greg Nash A prominent Jewish Democrat endorsed President Obama's diplomacy with Iran on Friday, giving the president crucial support amid growing pushback from Congress.

Senate Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) said she was “baffled” by her colleagues' press for more sanctions, and accused them of trying to “undermine” talks.

“I strongly oppose any attempt to increase sanctions against Iran while [international] negotiations are ongoing,” Feinstein said in a statement. “I am baffled by the insistence of some senators to undermine ... talks. I will continue to support these negotiations and oppose any new sanctions as long as we are making progress toward a genuine solution.”

ADVERTISEMENTThe White House has been trying — and failing — to convince lawmakers to hold off on new sanctions as it pursues a diplomatic deal over Iran's nuclear program.A growing number of lawmakers in both parties are urging the Senate to move ahead with new sanctions mirroring those the House passed by an overwhelming 400-20 vote in July.

Several Democrats have joined the call for sanctions — most recently Sen. Bob Casey (D-Pa.) — while Republicans have vowed to attach sanctions legislation to a pending defense bill if the Senate Banking panel won't pass a bill out of committee.

Feinstein echoed the administration's position that sanctions have succeeded in their purpose — bringing Iran to the negotiating table — and that adding new ones can only backfire.

“Tacking new sanctions onto the defense authorization bill or any other legislation would not lead to a better deal,” she said. “It would lead to no deal at all.”

Supporters of new sanctions say they are needed to dial up the pressure on Iran and force the country to abandon its nuclear ambitions.

Please send tips and comments to Julian Pecquet: jpecquet@thehill.com

Follow us on Twitter: @TheHillGlobal and @JPecquetTheHill 



]]>
<![CDATA[September 16th, 2013]]>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 18:48:36 GMThttps://izminc.org/whatz-up-with-it/september-16th-2013Picture
Secession Fever Sweeps Texas, Maryland, Colorado, and Californiaby Caitlin Dickson Sep 12, 2013 4:45 AM EDT
It seems to be sweeping the nation, with Texas seeking to become its own country and parts of Maryland, California, and Colorado trying to break off into new states. But do any of these movements have a chance? Caitlin Dickson reports.
     

  •  

  •     
  •  
  •  

Five counties in Maryland want to form their own state. So do eight in Colorado and one in Northern California. And the Lone Star State is on its way becoming an independent “island nation,” according to an influential Texas Republican.


Comstock

The wave of U.S. secession movements, the largest since the South tried to break up with the Union, is being fueled by a deep urban-rural split, says Frances Lee, a professor at the University of Maryland’s Department of Government and Politics. The fault lines are partisan affiliations and social issues such as reproductive rights and gun control. So it’s no coincidence that the counties seeking to break free generally identify as conservative or libertarian, nor is it a coincidence that they tend to be in rural areas. “This has a lot to do with the current composition of the White House,” says Lee. “Rural counties want to secede from states where they’ve been on the losing side of politics—even at the state level.”


In an interview with The Washington Post, western Maryland Initiative leader Scott Strzelczyk said his region, along with several others across the country vying for the title of America’s 51st state, is determined to separate itself from “the dominant ruling class.” Strzelczyk, an information-technology consultant, said he is frustrated with Maryland’s influential Democratic Party. “If you don’t belong in their party, you’ll never have your views represented,” he told the paper. “If we have more states, we can all go live in states that best represent us, and then we can get along.” Although the Western Maryland Initiative is little more than a Facebook page today, it’s gaining traction and support from members of the community eager to offer their services and suggestions for the formation of their dream state.


The movement in Colorado has made a bit more headway. Officials from eight counties met in July to start drawing up boundaries for a state dedicated to bettering the lives of those living in rural northern and northeastern Colorado. “Our voices are being ignored in the legislative process this year, and our very way of life is under attack,” Weld County Commissioner Sean Conway said in July, adding that not only is the effort “not a stunt,” it is indisputably motivated by a feeling of disenfranchisement among people in rural communities. Weld County is one of six in Colorado that will vote on a secession initiative in November.


Many of the rural counties itching for independence in northern Colorado are dependent on the oil and gas industry, says Kimberly Karnes, a professor of political science and geography at Old Dominion University in Virginia. So it stings when liberal politicians who live far from the range push for things like renewable energy. “Issues such as energy policy, gun control, taxes, and social issues often break on a rural-urban divide,” Karnes told The Daily Beast. “So if the state legislature produces a policy that a majority of residents in the urban and suburban areas prefer, it leaves the rural residents feeling like they are ignored, which over time can build to resentment and lead to the choice of extreme response, such as secession.”


Just last week, the Board of Supervisors in Northern California’s Siskiyou County voted almost unanimously to make a declaration of its intention to break off from the state and invite neighboring counties in California and Oregon to join them in forming a new state called “Jefferson.” Ahead of the vote, more than 100 citizens gathered to debate, most of them apparently in favor of separating themselves from the regulations and values supported by their state’s more populous and liberal southern region.


The last time a state successfully sought approval from the state legislature and Congress for secession was West Virginia in 1863. And while clusters of counties have attempted unsuccessfully to form their own states over the years, social media and the Internet have allowed these movements to gain more traction than they may have in the past. Now, instead of simply commiserating with their neighbors about the liberals in the capitol and trying to get a representative with their values elected, disgruntled Californians can find and meet like-minded residents around the county, encouraging them to give secession a shot.


And then there’s Texas. Last week, Texas railroad commissioner and aspiring attorney general Barry Smitherman declared that the Lone Star State has “made great progress in becoming an independent nation.” Smitherman, whose job is to regulate the state’s energy industry, not its railroads, argued that Texas’s “energy resources, fossil and otherwise, and our own independent electrical grid” make the state “uniquely situated” to “operate as a stand-alone entity” if the United States falls apart.


‘If the state legislature produces a policy that a majority of residents in the urban and suburban areas prefer, it leaves the rural residents feeling like they are ignored.’

Texas’s motivation for wanting to break free doesn’t fall along the same rural-vs.-urban pattern of the rest of the counties seeking secession. That’s hardly a surprise. In political science, “Texas is Texas. It doesn’t really follow what other states do,” said Karnes. “There’s really an independent political culture of that state that definitely identifies with its independence, the Republic of Texas. It doesn’t follow the trend of what these other states are doing. It’s in its own unique situation.”


Still, that doesn’t mean Texas has a greater chance of seceding successfully than western Maryland or northern Colorado or “Jefferson.” Even if one of them were to get the approval of both Congress and their state legislatures, they’d be faced with a barrage of new issues such as how to collect taxes, provide education, or transfer public records from the original state to the new one. How would a new state—with a rural economy that in many cases has long been propped up by its state’s urban and suburban economies—fund all these programs?


The list of issues Texas would face as its own country is even longer. Creating a military, setting up trade agreements, and finding a way to compensate for the federal funding it receives—whether or not its lawmakers want to admit it—only scratches the surface of what it takes to form a country. As for the counties seeking statehood, even if they accomplished their goal and became “the promised conservative or libertarian utopia these residents so often seem to want, the state is still a part of the United States of America, meaning it answers to and must work within the U.S. system, as it currently operates,” said Karnes. “For residents who want more personal freedoms and less government intrusion, they may find that even in a new state, Uncle Sam is still a frequent visitor in their community.”


Like The Daily Beast on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for updates all day long.



Caitlin Dickson is a reporter and researcher for The Daily Beast. She has also written for The New Republic and The Atlantic Wire.



For inquiries, please contact The Daily Beast at editorial@thedailybeast.com.


]]>
<![CDATA[October 19th, 2012]]>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 17:54:07 GMThttps://izminc.org/whatz-up-with-it/october-19th-2012Picture
U.K. Defense Agency Loses Appeal Over Iraq Death Negligence
By Erik Larson on October 19, 2012
Tweet
Facebook
LinkedIn
Google Plus
0 Comments
More from Businessweek
Num Pang Chef Ratha Chaupoly's Office Bag Lunch
The Cheerful Billionaire Who Thinks Obama's A Socialist
Office Upgrade: The Wooden Keyboard
GMAT Tip: Three Rules of Percents
Occupy the City


The U.K. Ministry of Defence lost an appeal to avoid a negligence lawsuit by the family of a soldier killed when his lightly armored vehicle was struck by a roadside bomb while he was on patrol in Iraq in 2006.
Businessweek
More About "iraq"
After U.S. Troops Leave Iraq, the State Dept. Steps In
Thu November 18, 2010, 5:00pm EST
Iraq Plans to Increase Oil Production
Wed December 23, 2009, 1:22pm EST
Red Star Over Iraq
Thu January 21, 2010, 9:00am EST

Private Lee Ellis’ sister and daughter may sue over claims the Ministry breached its “duty of care” by assigning Ellis a vehicle that was ill-equipped to withstand so-called improvised explosive devices, the Court of Appeal ruled in London today.

The ruling “establishes a principle that the Ministry of Defence -- like any other employer -- does owe soldiers a duty of care and this duty extends to providing safe equipment,” Jocelyn Cockburn, a lawyer for Ellis’s daughter Courtney and his sister Karla, said in a statement handed out in court.

Nearly 180 British soldiers died during the country’s eight-year involvement in the U.S.-led Iraq war before troops were withdrawn in 2011. The claims in the case, some of which involve a friendly fire incident during the first days of the invasion, include claims that soldiers weren’t properly trained or given equipment to protect from attacks.

“Our thoughts and concerns remain with those that were injured and the families of those that sadly lost their lives,” the Ministry of Defence said in an e-mailed statement. “As this is likely to be subject to further legal action it would be inappropriate for us to comment further.”
Roadside Bombs

The three-judge panel upheld a lower-court ruling that the Ellis’s, and relatives of two other soldiers killed in identical circumstances, can’t sue over claims the defense agency breached European human-rights law, because the deaths occurred outside its jurisdiction. The other human-rights claims were filed by the families of Private Philip Hewett and Lance Corporal Kirk Redpath, who were killed by roadside bombs in 2005 and 2007, respectively.

In the negligence case, the Ministry argued the deaths were covered by “combat immunity” and that it’s “not fair, just or reasonable to impose a duty of care in the provision of suitable equipment,” according to the judgment. The court rejected that defense, saying the facts should be determined at trial.

The families argue the vehicle, a Snatch Land Rover, was taken out of service after soldiers were killed by roadside bombs in 2005 and “should not have been put back into such use,” according to the judgment.

The negligence ruling also applies to another set of claims in the case filed by the family of a soldier killed in a so- called friendly fire incident in 2003, and two soldiers who were injured with him. They claim the military should have provided better vehicle-recognition training and technology that could have prevented it, according to the judgment.

The ruling is a “landmark decision” showing the Ministry can’t use the legal protection of the battlefield to avoid providing adequate equipment, said Shubhaa Srinivasan, a lawyer with Leigh Day & Co. who is representing the family of Stephen Allbutt, who died in the friendly fire incident.

“It is a morally and legally indefensible position to take,” Srinivasan said. “As a prudent employer, the MoD can have no excuses now and must get on with the business of ensuring that troops are properly equipped.”

Allbutt, along with Corporal Dan Twiddy and Trooper Andy Julien were in a Challenger II tank when they came under fire from another British tank on the fourth day of the Iraq war in 2003, Srinivasan said.

To contact the reporter on this story: Erik Larson in London at elarson4@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Anthony Aarons at aaarons@bloomberg.net

]]>
<![CDATA[September 27th, 2012]]>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 18:53:07 GMThttps://izminc.org/whatz-up-with-it/september-27th-2012Picture
Abbas accuses Israel of 'ethnic cleansing'



At UN General Assembly, Palestinian president says building settlements in east Jerusalem is 'campaign of ethnic cleansing against Palestinian people'

Associated Press Published: 09.27.12, 20:01 / Israel News










Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas accused Israel of ethnic cleansing Thursday for building settlements in east Jerusalem.



"It is a campaign of ethnic cleansing against the Palestinian people via the demolition of their homes," Abbas said in his speech to the UN General Assembly.



Relates stories:
PM: You want fanatics to have nuclear weapons?
Netanyahu, Abbas address UN General Assembly
PM: On Yom Kippur, Iran tyrant called for our demise



His remarks came shortly before Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addressed the assembly.






The Palestinians want east Jerusalem to the capital of their future state in the West Bank.



Abbas also said he has opened talks on a new bid for international recognition at the UN, but didn't specify exactly when he will ask the General Assembly to vote.



"Intensive consultations with the various regional organizations and the state members" were underway, he said.



The Palestinians will apply to the General Assembly for nonmember state status.






Abbas at UNGA (Photo: AFP)



That stands in sharp contrast to last year, when they asked the Security Council to admit them as a full member state, but the bid failed. Palestinian officials said their bid is likely to be submitted on November 29.



Abbas insisted that the new quest for recognition was "not seeking to delegitimize Israel, but rather establish a state that should be established: Palestine."


'Palestinians are angry'

Abbas said in a speech to the assembly that efforts to win Palestine status as an observer state – a lower level than last year's failed bid for recognition as a full state – were not intended to pose any threat to Israel.



However, Abbas said he was "speaking on behalf of an angry people," who believed they were not winning their rights despite adopting a "culture of peace and international resolutions,



"Israel gets rewarded while continues the policies of war, occupation and settlements," he said.



Abbas also accused Israel of seeking to "continue its occupation of East Jerusalem, and annex vast parts of West Bank ... and refuses to discuss seriously the Palestinian refugees issue."



He claimed that Israeli actions threatened to undermine the Palestinian Authority to the point "which could lead to its collapse."



Palestinian officials said that their bid for recognition will likely be submitted to the General Assembly on Nov. 29, after the US presidential election. Abbas has sought to avoid entangling the Palestinian statehood bid in US presidential politics.



Appealing to other nations for their support, Abbas asked world leaders to help avoid a new "catastrophe" in Palestine. "Support the establishment of the free state of Palestine now, and let peace win before it's too late," he said.



"We have started intensive consultations with the various regional organizations and the state members in order for the General Assembly to take a decision granting the state of Palestine the status of nonmember state during this UN session," he said.




At last year's General Assembly, Abbas took center stage with his attempt to win full membership to the world body. However, that application failed to win enough support in the UN Security Council.



Palestinians did win membership last year of UNESCO, the Paris-based UN cultural agency – despite the objections of Israel and the US.


]]>
<![CDATA[WHO WILL PICK UP THE PLATE,POTS AND PANZ.]]>Sun, 22 Jul 2012 15:56:05 GMThttps://izminc.org/whatz-up-with-it/who-will-pick-up-the-platepots-and-panz Picture
(Newser) – A Harlem icon has passed on. Sylvia Woods, the "Queen of Soul Food," died yesterday at 86 after fighting Alzheimer's, her family says. Tourists and celebrities from all over the world have flocked to her restaurant, Sylvia's, for half a century to sample its corn bread and fried chicken. "Sylvia gallantly battled Alzheimer's for the past several years, but never once lost her loving smile," her family said, according to CNN.

"We lost a legend," said Mayor Michael Bloomberg. "In her words, the food was made with 'a whole lot of love' and generations of family and friends have come together at what became a New York institution." Woods' empire reached far beyond the restaurant: She wrote two successful cookbooks, started a catering service, and launched Sylvia's Food Products across the country.

This is your new blog post. Click here and start typing, or drag in elements from the top bar.
]]>
<![CDATA[Saudi Arabia to reopen Egypt embassy after protests]]>Fri, 04 May 2012 16:23:24 GMThttps://izminc.org/whatz-up-with-it/saudi-arabia-to-reopen-egypt-embassy-after-protests
Saudi Arabia has announced it will reopen its embassy in Cairo after it was shut last week following protests.

The Saudi ambassador was recalled after protesters gathered to demand the release of an Egyptian human rights lawyer being held in the kingdom.

According to state news agency SPA, Saudi King Abdullah ordered the reopening of the embassy and consulates in Alexandria and Suez from Sunday.

A high-level Egyptian delegation had visited the kingdom to defuse tensions.

Egyptian human rights lawyer Ahmed al-Gizawi was detained on arrival in Saudi Arabia in early April and accused of insulting King Abdullah.

His family says he had gone to perform a pilgrimage, but Saudi authorities say Mr Gizawi was found by airport officials to be carrying drugs - allegedly more than 20,000 anti-anxiety pills - in his luggage.

Safety fears Egyptian activists say he was held after lodging a complaint against Saudi Arabia for its treatment of Egyptians in its prisons.

Many Egyptians work in Saudi Arabia and some claim they have been mistreated under Saudi law.

After the protest outside the Saudi embassy in Cairo, the Saudis recalled their ambassador and closed the embassy and consulates citing safety concerns.

A high-level delegation led by Egyptian parliament speaker Saad al-Katatni and the head of the consultative council Ahmed Fahmi travelled to Saudi Arabia to meet the king and try to defuse the situation.

However, there has been no word yet on the fate of Mr Gizawi who is thought to still be in custody in Saudi Arabia.

Observers say this has been the worst diplomatic falling-out between the two regional allies since Saudi Arabia severed ties after Egypt signed a peace deal with Israel in 1979.

]]>
<![CDATA[WAKE UP PEOPLE AND DONATE SO @ LEAST EYE CAN HELP US]]>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 23:51:39 GMThttps://izminc.org/whatz-up-with-it/wake-up-people-and-donate-so-least-eye-can-help-usYEMEN NOT PLAYING WITH IT Picture
SANAA — Fierce clashes killed at least 21 people, including 18 Al-Qaeda militants, on Monday near the southern Yemeni town of Loder, which Al-Qaeda is trying to capture, a local official said.

The other dead were an army officer and two tribal volunteers aiding the military.

The source said the A-Qaeda militants were forced to retreat in the direction of Amiin, 12 kilometres (7.5 miles) south of Loder.

Witnesses said the fighting lasted for several hours, and that air force planes had bombed militant positions in the mountains southeast of Loder, from which columns of smoke could be seen rising.

A tank in the hands of the militants, as well as two vehicles mounted with machineguns and ammunition stocks were destroyed, other sources said.

Al-Qaeda seized Loder in August 2010, but the army eventually drove it out.

Loder lies 150 kilometres northeast of Zinjibar, capital of Abyan province, which was seized last May by the Partisans of Sharia (Islamic law), an affiliate of Al-Qaeda in the Arabic Peninsula..

Copyright © 2012 AFP. All rights reserved. More »
Related articles
12 militants killed in Yemen battle, official says
Moneycontrol.com - 6 hours ago
Qaeda-linked group frees 73 Yemeni soldiers
msnbc.com (blog) - 11 hours ago
'Ali Abdullah Saleh to leave Yemen temporarily'
Zee News - 19 hours ago
More coverage (1) »
Add News to your Google Homepage




Yemeni army military vehicles drive near the southern town of Loder, in Abiyan province (AFP)

Map

]]>
<![CDATA[the gangs will fight the U.N. in Syria now they got they money right]]>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:53:51 GMThttps://izminc.org/whatz-up-with-it/the-gangs-will-fight-the-un-in-syria-now-they-got-they-money-rightTOP U.N. truce monitor in syria attack on Central Bank
Reuters) - A Norwegian general charged with overseeing a shaky U.N.-brokered truce in Syria arrived in Damascus on Sunday, boosting a monitor mission that activists say has helped ease the violence in the city of Homs, hotbed of a 13-month uprising.

In the capital, militants fired rocket-propelled grenades at the Central Bank building, causing slight damage, and wounded four police when they attacked their patrol, state television reported. Activists in Damascus reported explosions and gunfire.

General Robert Mood acknowledged the huge task awaiting the planned 300-strong unarmed mission, which now has 30 people on the ground, but said he was confident it could make headway.

"We will be only 300, but we can make a difference," Mood told reporters on his arrival in the Syrian capital.

"Thirty unarmed observers, 300 unarmed observers, even 1,000 unarmed observers cannot solve all the problems," he said. "I call on everyone to help us and cooperate with us in this very challenging task ahead."

The United Nations says President Bashar al-Assad's forces have killed 9,000 people during the revolt, the latest in a string of uprisings in the Arab world against autocratic rule.

Damascus says 2,600 of its personnel have died at the hands of anti-Assad militiamen, and has accused the United Nations of turning a blind eye to "terrorist acts" against security forces.

Syria's SANA official news agency said U.N. observers on Sunday toured the Khalidiya district of Homs, which endured weeks of shelling by government forces before the April 12 ceasefire.

An activist in Homs, speaking via Skype, said violence had dropped sharply in the city since the observers deployed a permanent two-man team to the restive city last week.

"There are still violations, but the shelling and mortar fire has stopped," Karam Abu Rabea said. "We have insisted that the observers stay in Homs because we know if they leave (the attacks) will continue."

He said the presence of the monitors on Saturday had allowed residents to retrieve three bodies that had previously been too risky to collect because of the threat of sniper fire.

The lull had also enabled people to clear rubbish left to rot in the streets. "There is a danger of disease from the rubbish. Until now it was left in the streets," Abu Rabea said.

BOMBING CLAIM

Despite the relative calm in Homs, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a UK-based group tracking the conflict, said at last 39 people were killed across the country on Sunday, including civilians, security forces and rebels.

Twenty-three civilians were killed, most of them shot by security forces in a single village in the central province of Hama, it said. Six rebel fighters were killed as well as seven members of the security forces - four of whom died when ammunition they were handling exploded.

On Sunday an Islamist group called "al-Nusra Front" claimed responsibility for a suicide bombing that killed at least nine people in Damascus on Friday.

Both sides have been accused of multiple violations of the ceasefire engineered by U.N.-Arab League envoy Kofi Annan.

Under the deal, Assad's tanks and troops are supposed to return to barracks. Damascus says this has happened, although U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon disagreed this week, saying he was "gravely alarmed by reports of continued violence."

"The problem is whether the Syrian government will agree to us deploying our own assets," he said late on Sunday.

Ban said Syria's U.N. ambassador had promised unconditional cooperation. But it was difficult to "give full credibility on their promise, because they have not kept their promises," he told reporters during a visit to Myanmar.

Besides Homs, the U.N. has established permanent monitoring post in the cities of Idlib, Hama and Deraa.

The presence of the monitors has emboldened thousands of protesters to resume demonstrations after weeks of military crackdown, but activists say Assad's forces have hit back.

Security forces carried out house to house raids in the Damascus suburb of Irbin on Saturday, arresting demonstration leaders who welcomed the observers a week ago, two resident activists said.

(Additional reporting by Martin Petty in Naypyitaw, Myanmar; Writing by Ed Cropley; Editing by Louise Ireland and Stacey Joyce)

]]>
<![CDATA[The tab for U.N.’s Rio summit: Trillions per year in taxes, transfers and price hikes Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/world/2012/04/20/tab-for-uns-rio-summit-trillions-per-year-in-taxes-transfers-and-price-hikes/#ixzz1svcrt1As]]>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:26:49 GMThttps://izminc.org/whatz-up-with-it/the-tab-for-uns-rio-summit-trillions-per-year-in-taxes-transfers-and-price-hikes-read-more-httpwwwfoxnewscomworld20120420tab-for-uns-rio-summit-trillions-per-year-in-taxes-transfers-and-price-hikesixzz1svcrt1asThe tab for U.N.’s Rio summit: Trillions per year in taxes, transfers and price hikes
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/world/2012/04/20/tab-for-uns-rio-summit-trillions-per-year-in-taxes-transfers-and-price-hikes/#ixzz1svcrt1As
Picture
The upcoming United Nations environmental conference on sustainable development will consider  a breathtaking array of carbon taxes, transfers of trillions of dollars from wealthy countries to poor ones, and new spending programs to guarantee that populations around the world are protected from the effects of the very programs the world organization wants to implement, according to stunning U.N. documents examined  by Fox News.

  The main goal of the much-touted, Rio + 20 United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, scheduled to be held in Brazil from June 20-23, and which Obama Administration officials have supported,  is to make dramatic and enormously expensive changes  in the way that the world does nearly everything—or, as one of the documents puts it, "a fundamental shift in the way we think and act."

Among the proposals on how the “challenges can and must be addressed,” according to U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon:  

--More than $2.1 trillion a year in wealth transfers from rich countries to poorer ones, in the name of fostering “green infrastructure, ”  “climate adaptation” and other “green economy” measures.  

--New carbon taxes for industrialized countries that could cost about $250 billion a year, or 0.6 percent of Gross Domestic Product, by 2020. Other environmental taxes are mentioned, but not specified.

--Further unspecified price hikes that extend beyond fossil fuels to anything derived from agriculture, fisheries, forestry, or other kinds of land and water use, all of which would be radically reorganized. These cost changes would “contribute to a more level playing field between established, 'brown' technologies and newer, greener ones."  

-- Major global social spending programs, including a "social protection floor" and "social safety nets" for the world's most vulnerable social groups  for reasons of “equity.”

--Even more social benefits for those displaced by the green economy revolution—including those put out of work in undesirable fossil fuel industries. The benefits, called “investments,”  would include “access to nutritious food, health services, education, training and retraining, and unemployment benefits."

--A guarantee that if those sweeping benefits weren’t enough, more would be granted. As one of the U.N. documents puts it:  “Any adverse effects of changes in prices of goods and services vital to the welfare of vulnerable groups must be compensated for and new livelihood opportunities provided."

Click here for the Executive Summary Report. 

That  huge catalogue of taxes and spending is described optimistically as “targeted investments  in human and social capital on top of investments in natural capital and green physical capital,” and is accompanied by the claim that it will all, in the long run, more than pay for itself.

But the whopping green “investment” list  barely scratches the surface of the mammoth exercise in global social engineering that is envisaged in the U.N. documents, prepared by the Geneva-based United Nations Environmental Management Group (UNEMG), a consortium of 36 U.N. agencies, development banks  and environmental bureaucracies, in advance of the Rio session.  

An earlier version of the report was presented  at a closed door session of the U.N.'s top bureaucrats during a Long Island retreat last October, where Rio was discussed as a "unique opportunity" to drive an expanding U.N. agenda for years ahead. 

Click here for more on this story from Fox News.

Under the ungainly title of Working Towards a Balanced and Inclusive Green Economy, A United Nations System-Wide Perspective,  the  final version of the 204-page report is intended to “contribute” to preparations for the Rio + 20 summit, where one of the two themes is “the green economy in the context of sustainable development and poverty eradication. ”  (The other theme is “the institutional framework for sustainable development” –sometimes known as global environmental governance.)

But in fact, it also lays out new roles for private enterprise, national governments, and a bevy of socialist-style worker, trade and citizens’ organizations in creating a sweeping international social reorganization, all closely monitored by regulators and governments to maintain environmental “sustainability” and “human equity.”   

“Transforming the global economy will require action locally (e.g., through land use planning), at the national level (e.g., through energy-use regulations) and at the international level (e.g., through technology diffusion),” the document says. It involves “profound changes in economic systems, in resource efficiency, in the composition of global demand, in production and consumption patterns and a major transformation in public policy-making.”  It will also require “a serious rethinking of lifestyles in developed countries.”

As the report puts it, even though “the bulk of green investments will come from the private sector," the "role of the public sector... is indispensable for influencing the flow of private financing."  It adds that the green economy model “recognizes the value of markets, but is not tied to markets as the sole or best solution to all problems.”

Among other countries, the report particularly lauds China as “a good example of combining investments and public policy incentives to encourage major advances in the development of cleaner technologies.”

Along those lines, it says, national governments need to reorganize themselves to " collectively design fiscal and tax policies as well as policies on how to use the newly generated revenue"  from their levies. There,  "U.N. entities can help governments and others to find the most appropriate ways of phasing out harmful subsidies while combining that with the introduction of new incentive schemes to encourage positive steps forward."

U.N. organizations can also “encourage the ratification of relevant international agreements, assist the Parties to implement and comply with related obligations...and build capacity, including that of legislators at national and sub-national levels to prepare and ensure compliance with regulations and standards."

The report declares that “scaled-up and accelerated international cooperation" is required, with new coordination at "the international, sub-regional, and regional levels."  Stronger regulation is needed, and “to avoid the proliferation of national regulations and standards, the use of relevant international standards is essential” -- an area where the U.N. can be very helpful, the report indicates.

The U.N. is also ready to supply new kinds of statistics to bolster and measure the changes that the organization foresees—including indicators that do away with old notions of economic growth and progress and replace them with new statistics. One example: “the U.N. System of Environmental-Economic Accounting (SEEA), which will become an internationally agreed statistical framework in 2012."  

These changes, the authors reassure readers, will  only be done in line with the “domestic development agendas” of the countries involved.

“A green economy is not a one-size-fits-all path towards sustainable development,” an executive summary of the report declares.   Instead it is a “dynamic policy toolbox” for local decision-makers, who can decide to use it optionally.

But even so, the  tools are intended for only one final aim. And they have the full endorsement  of U.N. Secretary General Ban, who declares in a forward to the document that “only such integrated approach will lay lasting foundations for peace and sustainable development," and calls the upcoming Rio conclave a "generational opportunity" to act.


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/world/2012/04/20/tab-for-uns-rio-summit-trillions-per-year-in-taxes-transfers-and-price-hikes/#ixzz1svd2L45r

]]>
<![CDATA[I HAVE ONE EURO WHO LOVES MONEY]]>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 15:03:44 GMThttps://izminc.org/whatz-up-with-it/i-have-one-euro-who-loves-money Spain retaliates over nationalisation of oil company Picture
Spain may cut imports of biodiesel from Argentina. It comes after the Latin American nation decided to nationalise the Spanish-controlled oil company YPF, taking control of 51 percent of the firm from Madrid-listed Repsol.

European biodiesel supplies may now be given preference in Spain.

“The objective of this decision is to support Spanish and EU refineries, so they can supply biodiesel under competitive conditions,” Soraya Saenz de Santamaria, Spain’s Deputy Prime Minister, said at a news conference.

Spain is thought to have imported around 750 million euros worth of biodiesel from Argentina last year.

Argentina’s president Cristina Fernandez says her country could use more of the fuel itself if Spain follows through with its threatened cut.


]]>